Punitha Kumari M.Nishanth, G.PRIYADHARSHINI vs Juliet Santhana Mary (Deceased) — CMP/12426/2026
Case under U/s 5 Limitation Act Section 1. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HCMA011012162026
Filing Number
CMP/75070/2026
Filing Date
24-Apr-2026
Registration No
CMP/12426/2026
Registration Date
08-May-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr Justice P. Velmurugan , Honourable Mrs.Justice K. Govindarajan Thilakavadi
Coram
Honourable Mr Justice P. Velmurugan , Honourable Mrs.Justice K. Govindarajan Thilakavadi
Bench Type
Division Bench
Judicial Branch
JUDICIALSECTION
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Punitha Kumari M.Nishanth, G.PRIYADHARSHINI
Respondent(s)
-
1.Juliet Santhana Mary (Deceased)
-
2.Sampooranam
-
3.Santhana Kumar
-
4.E.Suresh Babu
-
5.Elizabeth Paulin
-
6.C.Milton Madhanraj
-
7.C.Samson Rajkumar
-
8.Glaxton
-
9.Santhosh Roy
-
10.Srinivasan
-
11.W.R.Amuthavalli
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
02-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr Justice P. VELMURUGAN,Honourable Mrs.Justice K. Govindarajan ThilakavadiView PDF
Case Summary: CMP/12426/2026 The court issued notice to the respondents returnable in four weeks, with private notice also permitted. The petitioner's counsel must file an Affidavit of Service with proof of acknowledgment in the Registry within this period, failing which the appeal will be automatically dismissed at the SR stage. The matter has been listed for hearing after four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Jun-2026
To Condone Delay In Filing
Honourable Mr Justice P. Velmurugan , Honourable Mrs.Justice K. Govindarajan Thilakavadi
-
24-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CMP/12426/2026
Case Summary: CMP/12426/2026 The court issued notice to the respondents returnable in four weeks, with private notice also permitted. The petitioner's counsel must file an Affidavit of Service with proof of acknowledgment in the Registry within this period, failing which the appeal will be automatically dismissed at the SR stage. The matter has been listed for hearing after four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts