K PANNERSELVAM M/s.V.BALASUBRAMANI, S.NANDHINI,K.INDHUMATHI,L.UDAYARAJKUMAR,G.KAVITHA,V.VADIVELAN vs S Sathish — OA/418/2026

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 9. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCMA011010432026

e-Filing Number

15-04-2026

Filing Number

OA/74927/2026

Filing Date

15-Apr-2026

Registration No

OA/418/2026

Registration Date

29-Apr-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr.Justice K.kumaresh Babu

Coram

Honourable Mr.Justice K.kumaresh Babu

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Arbitration ( 9 )

Sub-Category

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (26 of 1996) ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

ORIGINALSECTION

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 9

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.K PANNERSELVAM M/s.V.BALASUBRAMANI, S.NANDHINI,K.INDHUMATHI,L.UDAYARAJKUMAR,G.KAVITHA,V.VADIVELAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.S Sathish

  2. 2.Suganthi S

  3. 3.The Sub Registrar

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 02-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr.Justice K.kumaresh BabuView PDF

    Case Summary: OA No. 418/2026 The Madras High Court granted an interim injunction restraining respondents S. Sathish and Suganthi S. from transferring, alienating, or selling a scheduled property. The applicant K. Pannerselvam established a prima facie case that the respondents borrowed money secured by depositing property title deeds under a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) dated 11.05.2023, and attempted to dispose of the property without repaying the loan despite dishonored cheques. The court found the balance of convenience favored granting the injunction to prevent irreparable hardship. Notice returnable in four weeks with case listed thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Jun-2026

    For Admission (Section 9 - Arbitration And Conciliation Act)

    Honourable Mr.Justice K.kumaresh Babu

  4. 15-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. OA/418/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: OA No. 418/2026 The Madras High Court granted an interim injunction restraining respondents S. Sathish and Suganthi S. from transferring, alienating, or selling a scheduled property. The applicant K. Pannerselvam established a prima facie case that the respondents borrowed money secured by depositing property title deeds under a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) dated 11.05.2023, and attempted to dispose of the property without repaying the loan despite dishonored cheques. The court found the balance of convenience favored granting the injunction to prevent irreparable hardship. Notice returnable in four weeks with case listed thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case