Balaji Transmission Belting Co., SIRI CHANDANA. K, S. VISHNU PRIYA ,V. AMIRTHA LEHA vs The Assistant Commissioner (ST), — WP/17723/2026

Case under Others Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 02nd June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMA011008412026

e-Filing Number

23-04-2026

Filing Number

WP/74783/2026

Filing Date

24-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/17723/2026

Registration Date

28-Apr-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Coram

Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Tax/Tolls ( 150 )

Judicial Branch

WRITSECTION

Decision Date

02-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Balaji Transmission Belting Co., SIRI CHANDANA. K, S. VISHNU PRIYA ,V. AMIRTHA LEHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Assistant Commissioner (ST),

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar RamamoorthyView PDF

    Case Summary: WP 17723/2026 The Madras High Court set aside a GST assessment order dated 10.10.2025 against Balaji Transmission Belting Co., finding that the petitioner was denied natural justice. The tax authority had confirmed demands related to GSTR 3B-2A mismatches, late filing penalties, and Form GSTR-9C penalties without properly notifying the petitioner, who was unaware of proceedings since communications were only uploaded on the GST portal. The court allowed the petitioner 15 days to submit written objections and directed the authority to grant a personal hearing and issue a fresh order within three months, noting the petitioner had already paid the entire tax demand. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

  4. 24-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/17723/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP 17723/2026 The Madras High Court set aside a GST assessment order dated 10.10.2025 against Balaji Transmission Belting Co., finding that the petitioner was denied natural justice. The tax authority had confirmed demands related to GSTR 3B-2A mismatches, late filing penalties, and Form GSTR-9C penalties without properly notifying the petitioner, who was unaware of proceedings since communications were only uploaded on the GST portal. The court allowed the petitioner 15 days to submit written objections and directed the authority to grant a personal hearing and issue a fresh order within three months, noting the petitioner had already paid the entire tax demand. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case