K S Builders vs The Deputy Commercial Tax Officer — WP/18913/2026

Case under Others Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 08th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMA011005612026

e-Filing Number

22-04-2026

Filing Number

WP/74571/2026

Filing Date

22-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/18913/2026

Registration Date

07-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Coram

Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Tax/Tolls ( 150 )

Judicial Branch

WRITSECTION

Decision Date

08-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.K S Builders

    Adv. Arun Kumar Jambulingam, T. Karthika,K. Manimegalai

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Deputy Commercial Tax Officer

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar RamamoorthyView PDF

    Case Summary: WP 18913/2026 The Madras High Court set aside a tax demand order issued by the Deputy Commercial Tax Officer against K S Builders, finding it was issued without providing the petitioner a hearing, thereby violating natural justice principles. The court remanded the matter for reconsideration on the condition that the petitioner remit 25% of the disputed tax demand within 30 days, after which the tax officer must issue a fresh order within three months following a fair hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

  4. 22-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/18913/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP 18913/2026 The Madras High Court set aside a tax demand order issued by the Deputy Commercial Tax Officer against K S Builders, finding it was issued without providing the petitioner a hearing, thereby violating natural justice principles. The court remanded the matter for reconsideration on the condition that the petitioner remit 25% of the disputed tax demand within 30 days, after which the tax officer must issue a fresh order within three months following a fair hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case