M/s. Zn Synergies Private Limited M/s. Ram Gokul Advocates and Associates, ,G.M.Gokulram,Elangovan S,Minu EJ,Jayaselvam P,Pavithra S,Pranav R vs The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (ST) — WP/17958/2026
Case under Others Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 02nd June 2026.
CNR: HCMA010995492026
e-Filing Number
22-04-2026
Filing Number
WP/73838/2026
Filing Date
22-Apr-2026
Registration No
WP/17958/2026
Registration Date
29-Apr-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
Coram
Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
Tax/Tolls ( 150 )
Judicial Branch
WRITSECTION
Decision Date
02-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/s. Zn Synergies Private Limited M/s. Ram Gokul Advocates and Associates, ,G.M.Gokulram,Elangovan S,Minu EJ,Jayaselvam P,Pavithra S,Pranav R
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (ST)
-
2.The Assistant Commissioner (ST)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
02-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar RamamoorthyView PDF
The Madras High Court set aside GST tax demand orders issued ex-parte (without hearing) against M/s. Zn Synergies Private Limited and remanded the matter for reconsideration. The court found that the original order (22.02.2025) and appeal order (30.01.2026) violated the company's right to be heard, and directed a fresh order be issued within three months after providing the petitioner reasonable opportunity to contest the claim, subject to verification that the recovered amount exceeded 25% of the total tax demand. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Jun-2026
For Admission
Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
-
22-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/17958/2026
The Madras High Court set aside GST tax demand orders issued ex-parte (without hearing) against M/s. Zn Synergies Private Limited and remanded the matter for reconsideration. The court found that the original order (22.02.2025) and appeal order (30.01.2026) violated the company's right to be heard, and directed a fresh order be issued within three months after providing the petitioner reasonable opportunity to contest the claim, subject to verification that the recovered amount exceeded 25% of the total tax demand. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts