ALL INDIA UNION BANK OFFICER STAFF ASSOCIATION M/S.ANNA MATHEW, M.N.SUMATHY,M.S.SOORYA BHARATHI vs UNION BANK OF INDIA — WMP/18111/2026
Case under Others Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 02nd June 2026.
CNR: HCMA010994832026
Filing Number
WMP/73789/2026
Filing Date
22-Apr-2026
Registration No
WMP/18111/2026
Registration Date
24-Apr-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr.Justice S. Sounthar
Coram
Honourable Mr.Justice S. Sounthar
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
Service ( 140 )
Sub-Category
Service ( 24 )
Judicial Branch
WRITSECTION
Decision Date
02-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ALL INDIA UNION BANK OFFICER STAFF ASSOCIATION M/S.ANNA MATHEW, M.N.SUMATHY,M.S.SOORYA BHARATHI
-
2.DEEPIKA G
Respondent(s)
-
1.UNION BANK OF INDIA
-
2.Union Bank of India
-
3.Government of India
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
02-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr.Justice S. SountharView PDF
Case Summary: WMP/18111/2026 The Madras High Court continued an interim stay on Union Bank of India's transfer policy (Circular No. 101885-2026) regarding Clause 5.4, finding that mandatory longer-tenure transfers for female officers violated Government of India guidelines requiring transfers near spouses/family. The court found the policy's provisions did not adequately comply with central directives from 2014 and 2024 mandating accommodation of female officers near family members, though it permitted transfers for officers who voluntarily submitted preferences and allowed the matter to proceed to final hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-May-2026
Honourable Mr.Justice S. SountharView PDF
-
07-May-2026
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Honourable Mr.Justice S. Sounthar
-
30-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WMP/18111/2026
Case Summary: WMP/18111/2026 The Madras High Court continued an interim stay on Union Bank of India's transfer policy (Circular No. 101885-2026) regarding Clause 5.4, finding that mandatory longer-tenure transfers for female officers violated Government of India guidelines requiring transfers near spouses/family. The court found the policy's provisions did not adequately comply with central directives from 2014 and 2024 mandating accommodation of female officers near family members, though it permitted transfers for officers who voluntarily submitted preferences and allowed the matter to proceed to final hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts