M.Udhayakumar vs The District Collector — AS/518/2026

Case under U/s 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 Section 1. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCMA010992512026

Filing Number

AS/73619/2026

Filing Date

22-Apr-2026

Registration No

AS/518/2026

Registration Date

07-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mrs.Justice R. Kalaimathi

Coram

Honourable Mrs.Justice R. Kalaimathi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

APPEAL ( 168 )

Sub-Category

S. 96 of CPC ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

JUDICIALSECTION

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

U/s 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M.Udhayakumar

    Adv. T.Naveen Chandar,G.Tamilselvan,G.Tamilselvan, P.Sreenath,G.Tamilselvan

  2. 2.U.Renuka

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The District Collector

  2. 2.The District Revenue Officer

  3. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer

  4. 4.The Tahsildar

  5. 5.The Village Administrative Officer

  6. 6.C.Aasaithambi

  7. 7.The Joint Commissioner

  8. 8.The Assistant Commissioner

  9. 9.THe Executive Officer

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mrs.Justice R. KalaimathiView PDF

    Case A.S./518/2026 Summary: The petition by M. Udhayakumar and U. Renuka was admitted by Justice R. Kalaimathi. Notice was issued to respondents 6-9, returnable within four weeks, while respondents 1-5 (District Collector, District Revenue Officer, and Revenue Divisional Officer) were represented by Government Advocate. Matter adjourned for four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Honourable Mrs.Justice R. Kalaimathi

  4. 22-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. AS/518/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case A.S./518/2026 Summary: The petition by M. Udhayakumar and U. Renuka was admitted by Justice R. Kalaimathi. Notice was issued to respondents 6-9, returnable within four weeks, while respondents 1-5 (District Collector, District Revenue Officer, and Revenue Divisional Officer) were represented by Government Advocate. Matter adjourned for four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case