Dr.Arul Pitchai, vs Install Foundation Pvt. Ltd., Advocate - Roshan Balasubramanian, (TIME EXPIRED),FOR CAVEATORS FOR SOLE RESPONDENT,V.SRINITHI MALAVIKA,SURABI PUHAZHENDI — CMP/12809/2026

Case under U/o Iv Rule 9(4) of as Rules Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DELAY CONDONED on 08th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMA010988192026

Filing Number

CMP/73253/2026

Filing Date

22-Apr-2026

Registration No

CMP/12809/2026

Registration Date

14-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr.Justice S. Sounthar

Coram

Honourable Mr.Justice S. Sounthar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Judicial Branch

JUDICIALSECTION

Decision Date

08-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DELAY CONDONED

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

U/o Iv Rule 9(4) of as Rules Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Dr.Arul Pitchai,

    Adv. Rahul Balaji,B.Madhan Babu-MS/1450/2002,B.Madhan Babu-MS/1450/2002, Vishnu Mohan-MS/2572/2012,B.Madhan Babu

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Install Foundation Pvt. Ltd., Advocate - Roshan Balasubramanian, (TIME EXPIRED),FOR CAVEATORS FOR SOLE RESPONDENT,V.SRINITHI MALAVIKA,SURABI PUHAZHENDI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr.Justice S. SountharView PDF

    The Madras High Court, in CMP.No.12809 of 2026, condoned a 225-day delay in representing a second appeal filed by Dr. Arul Pitchai against Install Foundation Pvt. Ltd. Justice S. Sounthar granted the condonation after finding the reasons provided in the supporting affidavit satisfactory, allowing the appeal to proceed despite the significant procedural delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Jun-2026

    To Condone Delay In Representation

    Honourable Mr.Justice S. Sounthar

  4. 22-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CMP/12809/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Madras High Court, in CMP.No.12809 of 2026, condoned a 225-day delay in representing a second appeal filed by Dr. Arul Pitchai against Install Foundation Pvt. Ltd. Justice S. Sounthar granted the condonation after finding the reasons provided in the supporting affidavit satisfactory, allowing the appeal to proceed despite the significant procedural delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case