Dr.Arul Pitchai, vs Install Foundation Pvt. Ltd., Advocate - Roshan Balasubramanian, (TIME EXPIRED),FOR CAVEATORS FOR SOLE RESPONDENT,V.SRINITHI MALAVIKA,SURABI PUHAZHENDI — CMP/12809/2026
Case under U/o Iv Rule 9(4) of as Rules Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DELAY CONDONED on 08th June 2026.
CNR: HCMA010988192026
Filing Number
CMP/73253/2026
Filing Date
22-04-2026
Registration No
CMP/12809/2026
Registration Date
14-05-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr.Justice S. SOUNTHAR
Coram
Honourable Mr.Justice S. SOUNTHAR
Bench Type
Single Bench
Judicial Branch
JUDICIALSECTION
Decision Date
08th June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DELAY CONDONED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Dr.Arul Pitchai,
Adv. Rahul Balaji,B.Madhan Babu-MS/1450/2002,B.Madhan Babu-MS/1450/2002, Vishnu Mohan-MS/2572/2012,B.Madhan Babu
Respondent(s)
Install Foundation Pvt. Ltd., Advocate - Roshan Balasubramanian, (TIME EXPIRED),FOR CAVEATORS FOR SOLE RESPONDENT,V.SRINITHI MALAVIKA,SURABI PUHAZHENDI
Hearing History
Judge: Honourable Mr.Justice S. SOUNTHAR
TO CONDONE DELAY IN REPRESENTATION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-06-2026 | TO CONDONE DELAY IN REPRESENTATION |
Orders
The Madras High Court, in CMP.No.12809 of 2026, condoned a 225-day delay in representing a second appeal filed by Dr. Arul Pitchai against Install Foundation Pvt. Ltd. Justice S. Sounthar granted the condonation after finding the reasons provided in the supporting affidavit satisfactory, allowing the appeal to proceed despite the significant procedural delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Madras High Court, in CMP.No.12809 of 2026, condoned a 225-day delay in representing a second appeal filed by Dr. Arul Pitchai against Install Foundation Pvt. Ltd. Justice S. Sounthar granted the condonation after finding the reasons provided in the supporting affidavit satisfactory, allowing the appeal to proceed despite the significant procedural delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts