George C Wiliams Productions vs Deputy State Tax Officer 2 — WP/19237/2026
Case under Others Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 08th June 2026.
CNR: HCMA010987262026
e-Filing Number
21-04-2026
Filing Number
WP/73182/2026
Filing Date
21-Apr-2026
Registration No
WP/19237/2026
Registration Date
08-May-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
Coram
Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
Tax/Tolls ( 150 )
Judicial Branch
WRITSECTION
Decision Date
08-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.George C Wiliams Productions
Adv. P.Thangaraju,B. Syed Mohamed Ibrahim,B. Syed Mohamed Ibrahim, M. Aishwariya,B. Syed Mohamed Ibrahim
Respondent(s)
-
1.Deputy State Tax Officer 2
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar RamamoorthyView PDF
Case Summary: WP/19237/2026 - George C Williams Productions v. Deputy State Tax Officer 2 The Madras High Court set aside a tax rejection order dated December 1, 2025, finding an alleged breach of natural justice principles. The court remanded the matter for reconsideration on the condition that George C Williams Productions pay 25% of the disputed tax demand within 30 days, after which the tax officer must issue a fresh order within three months following a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Jun-2026
For Admission
Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
-
21-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/19237/2026
Case Summary: WP/19237/2026 - George C Williams Productions v. Deputy State Tax Officer 2 The Madras High Court set aside a tax rejection order dated December 1, 2025, finding an alleged breach of natural justice principles. The court remanded the matter for reconsideration on the condition that George C Williams Productions pay 25% of the disputed tax demand within 30 days, after which the tax officer must issue a fresh order within three months following a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts