BENAZ ENTERPRISES NARESH KUMAR S, R.NareshBabu vs THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER — WP/19931/2026

Case under Others Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 10th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMA010979442026

e-Filing Number

20-04-2026

Filing Number

WP/72601/2026

Filing Date

20-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/19931/2026

Registration Date

15-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Coram

Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Tax/Tolls ( 150 )

Judicial Branch

WRITSECTION

Decision Date

10-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BENAZ ENTERPRISES NARESH KUMAR S, R.NareshBabu

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar RamamoorthyView PDF

    The Madras High Court found that a tax assessment order issued against Benaz Enterprises on 27.03.2024 was invalid because it was issued without hearing the petitioner, violating the principle of natural justice. The court set aside the order and remanded the matter for reconsideration, conditioned on the petitioner remitting 50% of the disputed tax demand within 30 days, after which the tax officer must issue a fresh order within three months after providing a reasonable hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

  4. 20-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/19931/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Madras High Court found that a tax assessment order issued against Benaz Enterprises on 27.03.2024 was invalid because it was issued without hearing the petitioner, violating the principle of natural justice. The court set aside the order and remanded the matter for reconsideration, conditioned on the petitioner remitting 50% of the disputed tax demand within 30 days, after which the tax officer must issue a fresh order within three months after providing a reasonable hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case