BENAZ ENTERPRISES NARESH KUMAR S, R.NareshBabu vs THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER — WP/19936/2026

Case under Others Section 1. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 10th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMA010979382026

e-Filing Number

20-04-2026

Filing Number

WP/72596/2026

Filing Date

20-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/19936/2026

Registration Date

15-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Coram

Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Tax/Tolls ( 150 )

Judicial Branch

WRITSECTION

Decision Date

10-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BENAZ ENTERPRISES NARESH KUMAR S, R.NareshBabu

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar RamamoorthyView PDF

    Summary of WP 19936/2026 (Madras High Court, 10-06-2026) The High Court set aside a commercial tax assessment order dated 29.04.2024 (for assessment year 2022-2023) against Benaz Enterprises, finding it was issued without providing the petitioner a reasonable opportunity to be heard. The court remanded the matter for reconsideration on condition that the petitioner remit 50% of the disputed tax demand within 30 days, after which the tax officer must issue a fresh order within three months, providing the petitioner a fair hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/19936/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of WP 19936/2026 (Madras High Court, 10-06-2026) The High Court set aside a commercial tax assessment order dated 29.04.2024 (for assessment year 2022-2023) against Benaz Enterprises, finding it was issued without providing the petitioner a reasonable opportunity to be heard. The court remanded the matter for reconsideration on condition that the petitioner remit 50% of the disputed tax demand within 30 days, after which the tax officer must issue a fresh order within three months, providing the petitioner a fair hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case