KUPPU vs The Tahsildar — WP/18470/2026

Case under Others Section 1. Disposed: Contested--WITHDRAWN DISMISSED on 02nd June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMA010977772026

Filing Number

WP/72509/2026

Filing Date

21-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/18470/2026

Registration Date

06-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr.Justice Mohammed Shaffiq

Coram

Honourable Mr.Justice Mohammed Shaffiq

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

General Miscellaneous ( 78 )

Judicial Branch

WRITSECTION

Decision Date

02-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--WITHDRAWN DISMISSED

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KUPPU

    Adv. N.Naganathan,M.Manoharan,M.Manoharan, J.Gopika,S.Azaraf Ali,R.Rajkumar,M.Manoharan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Tahsildar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr.Justice Mohammed ShaffiqView PDF

    Kuppu filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking to quash an impugned order and direct the Tahsildar to issue a legal heir certificate including her, her four children, and three step-children as legal heirs of her late husband Chinnayan. On the date of hearing, the petitioner's counsel sought permission to withdraw the petition, which the court granted. The writ petition was accordingly dismissed as withdrawn with no costs imposed, and the connected miscellaneous petition was closed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Honourable Mr.Justice Mohammed Shaffiq

  4. 21-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/18470/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Kuppu filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking to quash an impugned order and direct the Tahsildar to issue a legal heir certificate including her, her four children, and three step-children as legal heirs of her late husband Chinnayan. On the date of hearing, the petitioner's counsel sought permission to withdraw the petition, which the court granted. The writ petition was accordingly dismissed as withdrawn with no costs imposed, and the connected miscellaneous petition was closed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case