KUPPUSWAMY KUMARESAN, M/s.M.Senthilkumar, D.Kanagasundaram-MS/282/2000,V.Mukilan,R.Ananth vs THE DEPUTY STATE TAX OFFICER 1 (FAC), — WP/19232/2026

Case under Others Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 08th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMA010968192026

e-Filing Number

18-04-2026

Filing Number

WP/71709/2026

Filing Date

20-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/19232/2026

Registration Date

08-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Coram

Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Tax/Tolls ( 150 )

Judicial Branch

WRITSECTION

Decision Date

08-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KUPPUSWAMY KUMARESAN, M/s.M.Senthilkumar, D.Kanagasundaram-MS/282/2000,V.Mukilan,R.Ananth

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE DEPUTY STATE TAX OFFICER 1 (FAC),

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar RamamoorthyView PDF

    Case Summary: WP 19232/2026 The Madras High Court set aside a GST assessment order dated 23.08.2024 against Kuppuswamy Kumaresan (Kumaran Theatre proprietor) for FY 2019-20, finding an alleged breach of natural justice principles. The court remanded the matter for reconsideration on the condition that the petitioner remit 50% of the disputed tax demand within 30 days, after which the tax authority must issue a fresh order within three months with reasonable opportunity provided to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

  4. 20-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/19232/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP 19232/2026 The Madras High Court set aside a GST assessment order dated 23.08.2024 against Kuppuswamy Kumaresan (Kumaran Theatre proprietor) for FY 2019-20, finding an alleged breach of natural justice principles. The court remanded the matter for reconsideration on the condition that the petitioner remit 50% of the disputed tax demand within 30 days, after which the tax authority must issue a fresh order within three months with reasonable opportunity provided to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case