Sellamuthu vs THE SUB REGISTRAR — WA/1176/2026
Case under U/c 15 of Letters Patent Set Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 02nd June 2026.
CNR: HCMA010967302026
Filing Number
WA/71629/2026
Filing Date
20-04-2026
Registration No
WA/1176/2026
Registration Date
30-04-2026
Judge
Honourable Dr Justice G. JAYACHANDRAN , Honourable Mrs.Justice N. MALA
Coram
Honourable Dr Justice G. JAYACHANDRAN , Honourable Mrs.Justice N. MALA
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
Registration ( 132 )
Sub-Category
Registration Act, 1908 (16 of 1908) ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIALSECTION
Decision Date
02nd June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sellamuthu
Adv. R.Prabakar, S.NISHATH,S.VIGNESH,M.SARADA DEVI,S.RANJITH KUMARAN,P.Marudhupandiyan-MS/1144/2018,S.SELVI,S.SENTHILKUMAR
Harshini
Respondent(s)
THE SUB REGISTRAR
Hearing History
Judge: Honourable Dr Justice G. JAYACHANDRAN , Honourable Mrs.Justice N. MALA
FOR ADMISSION - (WA)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-06-2026 | FOR ADMISSION - (WA) |
Orders
Summary of WA/1176/2026 The Madras High Court dismissed Sellamuthu and Harshini's writ appeal challenging the single judge's order that quashed the Sub Registrar's refusal check slip dated 27.01.2026. The court held that while the lower court correctly quashed the invalid refusal and directed fresh consideration of the document on merits, the court cannot issue positive mandates for registration—that responsibility belongs exclusively to the Registering Authority. The appeal was dismissed without costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of WA/1176/2026 The Madras High Court dismissed Sellamuthu and Harshini's writ appeal challenging the single judge's order that quashed the Sub Registrar's refusal check slip dated 27.01.2026. The court held that while the lower court correctly quashed the invalid refusal and directed fresh consideration of the document on merits, the court cannot issue positive mandates for registration—that responsibility belongs exclusively to the Registering Authority. The appeal was dismissed without costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts