N.Ponnusamy vs The Assistant Executive Engineer — WA/1514/2026

Case under U/c 15 of Letters Patent Set Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED FOR NOT PRESSED on 15th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMA010965342026

Filing Number

WA/71481/2026

Filing Date

20-Apr-2026

Registration No

WA/1514/2026

Registration Date

08-Jun-2026

Judge

Honourable The Chief Justice , Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul Murugan

Coram

Honourable The Chief Justice , Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul Murugan

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

Electricity ( 56 )

Judicial Branch

JUDICIALSECTION

Decision Date

15-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED FOR NOT PRESSED

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

U/c 15 of Letters Patent Set Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.N.Ponnusamy

    Adv. N.Subramaniyan,L.Sathiyaraj,L.Sathiyaraj, J.K.Prabhanchan,M.S.Vivek,L.Sathiyaraj

  2. 2.P.Ambika

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Assistant Executive Engineer

  2. 2.The Executive Engineer

  3. 3.The Superintending Engineer

  4. 4.The Block Development Officer Cum Special Officer,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Honourable The Chief JUSTICE,Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul MuruganView PDF

    The Madras High Court dismissed the writ appeal filed by N. Ponnusamy and P. Ambika against TANTRANSCO engineers as not pressed, since the appellants' counsel declined to proceed further and the main writ petition was scheduled for final hearing. No costs were awarded, and the interim application was closed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    For Admission - (Wa)

    Honourable The Chief Justice , Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul Murugan

  4. 20-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WA/1514/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Madras High Court dismissed the writ appeal filed by N. Ponnusamy and P. Ambika against TANTRANSCO engineers as not pressed, since the appellants' counsel declined to proceed further and the main writ petition was scheduled for final hearing. No costs were awarded, and the interim application was closed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case