DR.Hisamuddin Papa Saheb M/s.Vigneshwar Elango, PAVITHRA SUNDARARAJAN,ALLADI RAHUL (410/ vs Muhhammad Mujubeer Rahman and another — CS/102/2025

Case under Tamil Nadu Court-fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1955 Section 1. Next hearing: 15th April 2026.

Next hearing 15-Apr-2026

CNR: HCMA010963192025

Filing Number

CS/67960/2025

Filing Date

23-Apr-2025

Registration No

CS/102/2025

Registration Date

28-Apr-2025

Judge

Addl. Master - III

Coram

Addl. Master - III

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Suits ( 149 )

Judicial Branch

ORIGINALSECTION

Last updated 22-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Tamil Nadu Court-fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1955 Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DR.Hisamuddin Papa Saheb M/s.Vigneshwar Elango, PAVITHRA SUNDARARAJAN,ALLADI RAHUL (410/

  2. 2.,MANJUNATH KARTHIKEYAN (4622/

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Muhhammad Mujubeer Rahman and another

    Adv. N.A.NASSIR HUSAIN(4694/

  2. 2.,NO.337, LINGHI CHETTY ST,CH-1,MOB-9791023911 , 9176319979,VAK FOR D1 AND D2- D.NO-20439/2025- FILED ON-10/06/2025 1123

  3. 3.Nawab Fazeelathunnisa Saheba

Case History

  1. 15-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 29-Apr-2026

    For Recording Evidence

    Addl. Master - III

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Addl. Master - IIIView PDF

    This document records the chief examination of the plaintiff (Mr. Hisamuddin Papa) in civil suit C.S. No. 102 of 2025 before the Additional Master-III, High Court of Madras on 15.04.2026. The plaintiff filed a proof affidavit and several documentary exhibits (Ex.P1-P7) including a biography, communications, and notices issued by the first defendant, with the defendants' counsel objecting to the admissibility of the photocopied documents subject to proof and relevancy. The proceeding documents the witness examination and marking of exhibits but does not contain a final order or judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 15-Apr-2026

    For Recording Evidence

    Addl. Master - III

  5. 23-Mar-2026

    For Recording Evidence

    Addl. Master - III

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    For Recording Evidence

    Addl. Master - III

  7. 24-Feb-2026

    For Recording Evidence

    Addl. Master - III

  8. 10-Feb-2026

    For Filing

    Honourable Mr.Justice P. Dhanabal

  9. 30-Jan-2026

    Honourable Mr.Justice P. DhanabalView PDF

  10. 07-Jan-2026

    = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

    Honourable Mr.Justice P. Dhanabal

  11. 15-Dec-2025

    Honourable Mr.Justice P. DhanabalView PDF

  12. 15-Dec-2025

    = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

    Honourable Mr.Justice P. Dhanabal

  13. 05-Dec-2025

    = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

    Honourable Mr.Justice P. Dhanabal

  14. 17-Nov-2025

    For Orders

    Honourable Mr.Justice P. Dhanabal

  15. 30-Oct-2025

    For Arguments

    Honourable Mr.Justice P. Dhanabal

  16. 16-Oct-2025

    Application In CIVIL Suits

    Honourable Mr.Justice P. Dhanabal

  17. 14-Oct-2025

    Application In CIVIL Suits

    Honourable Mr.Justice P. Dhanabal

  18. 16-Sep-2025

    Application In CIVIL Suits

    Honourable Mr.Justice P. Dhanabal

  19. 12-Sep-2025

    Application In CIVIL Suits

    Honourable Mr.Justice P. Dhanabal

  20. 09-Sep-2025

    Application In CIVIL Suits

    Honourable Mr.Justice P. Dhanabal

  21. 18-Aug-2025

    Application In CIVIL Suits

    Honourable Mr.Justice K.kumaresh Babu

  22. 04-Aug-2025

    Application In CIVIL Suits

    Honourable Mr.Justice K.kumaresh Babu

  23. 17-Jul-2025

    Application In CIVIL Suits

    Honourable Mr.Justice K.kumaresh Babu

  24. 10-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  25. 23-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CS/102/2025

casestatus.in Summary

This document records the chief examination of the plaintiff (Mr. Hisamuddin Papa) in civil suit C.S. No. 102 of 2025 before the Additional Master-III, High Court of Madras on 15.04.2026. The plaintiff filed a proof affidavit and several documentary exhibits (Ex.P1-P7) including a biography, communications, and notices issued by the first defendant, with the defendants' counsel objecting to the admissibility of the photocopied documents subject to proof and relevancy. The proceeding documents the witness examination and marking of exhibits but does not contain a final order or judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case