SRI SENTHILKUMARAN TIMBERS J MADHUSUTHANAN, R.KUMAR vs ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER ST — WP/19736/2026

Case under Others Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 10th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMA010955282026

e-Filing Number

19-04-2026

Filing Number

WP/70777/2026

Filing Date

20-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/19736/2026

Registration Date

14-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Coram

Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Tax/Tolls ( 150 )

Judicial Branch

WRITSECTION

Decision Date

10-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SRI SENTHILKUMARAN TIMBERS J MADHUSUTHANAN, R.KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER ST

  2. 2.The Branch Manager

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar RamamoorthyView PDF

    Case Summary: WP 19736/2026 The Madras High Court set aside a GST assessment order dated 16.08.2024 against Sri Senthilkumaran Timbers, finding it was issued without hearing the petitioner. The court remanded the matter for reconsideration with a reasonable opportunity to be heard, conditional on the petitioner depositing 40% of the disputed tax demand (plus prior 10% deposit) within 30 days, with a fresh order to be issued within three months. The bank attachment was ordered to be raised upon fulfillment of this condition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

  4. 20-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/19736/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP 19736/2026 The Madras High Court set aside a GST assessment order dated 16.08.2024 against Sri Senthilkumaran Timbers, finding it was issued without hearing the petitioner. The court remanded the matter for reconsideration with a reasonable opportunity to be heard, conditional on the petitioner depositing 40% of the disputed tax demand (plus prior 10% deposit) within 30 days, with a fresh order to be issued within three months. The bank attachment was ordered to be raised upon fulfillment of this condition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case