SRI VISHNU EXPORTS SANSKAR SAMDARIA, SOURABH SAMDARIA vs DEPUTY STATE TAX OFFICER — WP/19804/2026

Case under Others Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 10th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMA010946592026

e-Filing Number

16-04-2026

Filing Number

WP/70152/2026

Filing Date

16-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/19804/2026

Registration Date

14-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Coram

Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Tax/Tolls ( 150 )

Judicial Branch

WRITSECTION

Decision Date

10-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SRI VISHNU EXPORTS SANSKAR SAMDARIA, SOURABH SAMDARIA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DEPUTY STATE TAX OFFICER

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar RamamoorthyView PDF

    The Madras High Court set aside a GST demand order dated 28.10.2025 issued to Sri Vishnu Exports without providing a hearing, finding the tax authority violated natural justice. The court remanded the matter for reconsideration on the condition that the petitioner remits 25% of the disputed tax demand within thirty days, after which the tax officer must issue a fresh order within three months following a reasonable opportunity to be heard. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/19804/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Madras High Court set aside a GST demand order dated 28.10.2025 issued to Sri Vishnu Exports without providing a hearing, finding the tax authority violated natural justice. The court remanded the matter for reconsideration on the condition that the petitioner remits 25% of the disputed tax demand within thirty days, after which the tax officer must issue a fresh order within three months following a reasonable opportunity to be heard. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case