M/s. SRI AMMAN JEWELLERY K.Sankaranarayanan vs UNION OF INDIA — WP/18594/2026

Case under Others Section 1. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.

Next hearing 24-Jun-2026

CNR: HCMA010928962026

e-Filing Number

13-04-2026

Filing Number

WP/68759/2026

Filing Date

15-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/18594/2026

Registration Date

06-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Coram

Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Tax/Tolls ( 150 )

Judicial Branch

WRITSECTION

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/s. SRI AMMAN JEWELLERY K.Sankaranarayanan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA

  2. 2.THE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX COUNCIL

  3. 3.THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU

  4. 4.THE JOINT DIRECTOR

  5. 5.THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR

  6. 6.THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF CGST and CENTRAL EXCISE

  7. 7.THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF CGST and CENTRAL EXCISE

  8. 8.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF CGST CENTRAL EXCISE

  9. 9.THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF CGST and CENTRAL EXCISE,

Case History

  1. 24-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 24-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

  3. 04-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar RamamoorthyView PDF

    Case Summary: WP No. 18594 of 2026 Sri Amman Jewellery challenged GST show cause notices issued by the fifth respondent, contending the issuing officer lacks authority as a "proper officer" under GST law. The court allowed the petitioner to reply to the notices and raised all objections, while restraining respondents from issuing final orders until the next hearing. Matter adjourned to 24.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 04-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 15-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/18594/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP No. 18594 of 2026 Sri Amman Jewellery challenged GST show cause notices issued by the fifth respondent, contending the issuing officer lacks authority as a "proper officer" under GST law. The court allowed the petitioner to reply to the notices and raised all objections, while restraining respondents from issuing final orders until the next hearing. Matter adjourned to 24.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case