K.Sutharsanam vs THE GENERAL MANAGER — WP/18160/2026
Case under Others Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 02nd June 2026.
CNR: HCMA010928282026
Filing Number
WP/68703/2026
Filing Date
16-Apr-2026
Registration No
WP/18160/2026
Registration Date
30-Apr-2026
Judge
Honourable Ms. Justice P.T. Asha
Coram
Honourable Ms. Justice P.T. Asha
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
Service ( 140 )
Sub-Category
Retirement Benefit cum Pension ( 20 )
Judicial Branch
WRITSECTION
Decision Date
02-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.K.Sutharsanam
Adv. S.T.Varadarajalu, R.RAJNIKANTH,A.KANAGASABAPATHY,T.KARKIVELAN
-
2.D.Devaraj
-
3.V.Sekar
-
4.S.Thangaraj
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE GENERAL MANAGER
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
02-Jun-2026
Honourable Ms. Justice P.T. AshaView PDF
The Madras High Court granted the writ petition and directed Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation to pay differential leave salary, gratuity, and pension arrears to four retired employees (helpers, drivers, and conductors) as per the 15th Wage Settlement dated 29.05.2025 with retrospective effect from 01.09.2023. The court ordered payment at 6% per annum interest within six weeks, after the corporation's counsel agreed to comply with settlement obligations previously denied to employees who retired before the settlement was finalized. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Jun-2026
For Admission
Honourable Ms. Justice P.T. Asha
-
16-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/18160/2026
The Madras High Court granted the writ petition and directed Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation to pay differential leave salary, gratuity, and pension arrears to four retired employees (helpers, drivers, and conductors) as per the 15th Wage Settlement dated 29.05.2025 with retrospective effect from 01.09.2023. The court ordered payment at 6% per annum interest within six weeks, after the corporation's counsel agreed to comply with settlement obligations previously denied to employees who retired before the settlement was finalized. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts