P.Rayin, vs K.L.Suveetha Shri, — LPA/16/2026

Case under U/c 15 of Letters Patent Set Section 1. Disposed: Contested--WITHDRAWN DISMISSED on 10th June 2026.

CNR: HCMA010927882026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

LPA/68670/2026

Filing Date

16-04-2026

Registration No

LPA/16/2026

Registration Date

30-04-2026

Judge

Honourable Dr.Justice ANITA SUMANTH , Honourable Mr.Justice SUNDER MOHAN

Coram

Honourable Dr.Justice ANITA SUMANTH , Honourable Mr.Justice SUNDER MOHAN

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

LETTERS PATENT APPEAL ( 175 )

Sub-Category

Against Contempt application ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

JUDICIALSECTION

Decision Date

10th June 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--WITHDRAWN DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

U/c 15 of Letters Patent Set Section 1

Petitioner(s)

P.Rayin,

Adv. P.Anbarasan,A.Karthikesan-MS/622/1998,A.Karthikesan-MS/622/1998, ,M.Meenatchi,A.PRAVEEN KUMAR,A.Karthikesan

Respondent(s)

K.L.Suveetha Shri,

Hearing History

Judge: Honourable Dr.Justice ANITA SUMANTH , Honourable Mr.Justice SUNDER MOHAN

03-06-2026

FOR ADMISSION - LPA CASES

10-06-2026

FOR ADMISSION - LPA CASES

Orders

10-06-2026
Honourable Dr.Justice ANITA SUMANTH,Honourable Mr.Justice SUNDER MOHAN

The Madras High Court dismissed LPA Nos. 16 and 17 of 2026 filed by P. Rayin and P. Rayin Construction Company Pvt. Ltd. against the Municipal Commissioner of Gudalur Municipality as withdrawn, upon the appellants' counsel's request for permission to withdraw. The court permitted the appellants to move the appropriate forum in accordance with law for modification of the earlier orders passed in Contempt Petitions Nos. 2476 and 2591 of 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Madras High Court dismissed LPA Nos. 16 and 17 of 2026 filed by P. Rayin and P. Rayin Construction Company Pvt. Ltd. against the Municipal Commissioner of Gudalur Municipality as withdrawn, upon the appellants' counsel's request for permission to withdraw. The court permitted the appellants to move the appropriate forum in accordance with law for modification of the earlier orders passed in Contempt Petitions Nos. 2476 and 2591 of 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case