MR.V.KISHOR KUMAR vs CANARA BANK — WP/17695/2026

Case under Others Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWAL on 01st June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMA010927282026

Filing Number

WP/68618/2026

Filing Date

16-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/17695/2026

Registration Date

28-Apr-2026

Judge

Honourable The Chief Justice , Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul Murugan

Coram

Honourable The Chief Justice , Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul Murugan

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

Banking ( 15 )

Sub-Category

Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, ( 33 )

Judicial Branch

WRITSECTION

Decision Date

01-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWAL

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MR.V.KISHOR KUMAR

    Adv. K.V.Babu,TARUN KRISHNA,TARUN KRISHNA, TARUN KRISHNA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.CANARA BANK

  2. 2.Canara Bank

  3. 3.MR.M.Veerashekar

  4. 4.MR.M.Arivazhagan

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Jun-2026

    Honourable The Chief JUSTICE,Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul MuruganView PDF

    The Madras High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by V. Kishor Kumar challenging Canara Bank's declaration of his educational loan account (No. 1281651006730) as a non-performing asset on 25.09.2024. The petitioner's counsel sought withdrawal with liberty to approach the appropriate forum, which the court permitted, dismissing the petition as withdrawn with no costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Honourable The Chief Justice , Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul Murugan

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/17695/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Madras High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by V. Kishor Kumar challenging Canara Bank's declaration of his educational loan account (No. 1281651006730) as a non-performing asset on 25.09.2024. The petitioner's counsel sought withdrawal with liberty to approach the appropriate forum, which the court permitted, dismissing the petition as withdrawn with no costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case