Amutham Foods Anish G K, P.GOWTHAM,DISHA JAIN vs The Deputy State Tax Officer- II — WP/18044/2026

Case under Others Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 02nd June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMA010924612026

e-Filing Number

14-04-2026

Filing Number

WP/68425/2026

Filing Date

15-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/18044/2026

Registration Date

30-Apr-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Coram

Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Tax/Tolls ( 150 )

Judicial Branch

WRITSECTION

Decision Date

02-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Amutham Foods Anish G K, P.GOWTHAM,DISHA JAIN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Deputy State Tax Officer- II

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar RamamoorthyView PDF

    The Madras High Court set aside a GST tax demand order (dated 19.11.2025) issued against Amutham Foods by the Deputy State Tax Officer, finding the order was issued without hearing the petitioner. The court remanded the matter for fresh reconsideration on the condition that the petitioner remits 25% of the disputed tax demand within 30 days, after which the tax officer must provide reasonable opportunity to contest and issue a fresh order within three months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

  4. 15-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/18044/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Madras High Court set aside a GST tax demand order (dated 19.11.2025) issued against Amutham Foods by the Deputy State Tax Officer, finding the order was issued without hearing the petitioner. The court remanded the matter for fresh reconsideration on the condition that the petitioner remits 25% of the disputed tax demand within 30 days, after which the tax officer must provide reasonable opportunity to contest and issue a fresh order within three months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case