P.VINAYAGAM vs The Managing Director — WP/18041/2026

Case under Others Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 02nd June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMA010923942026

Filing Number

WP/68380/2026

Filing Date

16-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/18041/2026

Registration Date

30-Apr-2026

Judge

Honourable Ms. Justice P.T. Asha

Coram

Honourable Ms. Justice P.T. Asha

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Service ( 140 )

Sub-Category

Retirement Benefit cum Pension ( 20 )

Judicial Branch

WRITSECTION

Decision Date

02-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.P.VINAYAGAM

    Adv. J.Lakshminarayanan,A. Brindha Devipriya,A. Brindha Devipriya, P Mohanraj,P. Manoj Kumar,A. Brindha Devipriya

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Managing Director

  2. 2.The General Manager

  3. 3.The Administrator

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Jun-2026

    Honourable Ms. Justice P.T. AshaView PDF

    Summary of WP No. 18041/2026 - P. Vinayagam v. Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation P. Vinayagam, a retired Traffic Inspector with 32 years of service, sought wage revisions and arrears based on the 15th Wage Settlement (dated 29.05.2025) with retrospective effect from 01.09.2023. The Madras High Court directed the respondent corporation to pay differential amounts in leave salary, gratuity, and pension arrears per the settlement, plus 6% interest within six weeks. The petition was disposed after the respondents conceded the claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Honourable Ms. Justice P.T. Asha

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/18041/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of WP No. 18041/2026 - P. Vinayagam v. Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation P. Vinayagam, a retired Traffic Inspector with 32 years of service, sought wage revisions and arrears based on the 15th Wage Settlement (dated 29.05.2025) with retrospective effect from 01.09.2023. The Madras High Court directed the respondent corporation to pay differential amounts in leave salary, gratuity, and pension arrears per the settlement, plus 6% interest within six weeks. The petition was disposed after the respondents conceded the claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case