Mr. Sembana Gounder Chinnusamy Senthilkumar M.PRAVEEN BALAJI, M. Neshapriyan,R. Vigneshwaran,Praveen Kumar P vs The State Tax Officer/ — WP/17940/2026

Case under Others Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 02nd June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMA010923282026

e-Filing Number

08-04-2026

Filing Number

WP/68327/2026

Filing Date

08-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/17940/2026

Registration Date

29-Apr-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Coram

Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Tax/Tolls ( 150 )

Judicial Branch

WRITSECTION

Decision Date

02-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mr. Sembana Gounder Chinnusamy Senthilkumar M.PRAVEEN BALAJI, M. Neshapriyan,R. Vigneshwaran,Praveen Kumar P

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State Tax Officer/

  2. 2.The Deputy Commissioner (CT), Erode

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar RamamoorthyView PDF

    The Madras High Court set aside tax assessment orders dated 25.02.2025 and 27.01.2026 passed by the State Tax Officer and Deputy Commissioner (CT), Erode, finding they violated natural justice principles by being issued without hearing the petitioner. The court remanded the matter for reconsideration on the condition that the petitioner remits 25% of the disputed tax demand within 30 days, after which tax authorities must issue a fresh order within three months after providing reasonable opportunity to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

  4. 08-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/17940/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Madras High Court set aside tax assessment orders dated 25.02.2025 and 27.01.2026 passed by the State Tax Officer and Deputy Commissioner (CT), Erode, finding they violated natural justice principles by being issued without hearing the petitioner. The court remanded the matter for reconsideration on the condition that the petitioner remits 25% of the disputed tax demand within 30 days, after which tax authorities must issue a fresh order within three months after providing reasonable opportunity to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case