M. Venkatesan, vs The Managing Director, — WP/18082/2026

Case under Others Section 1. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 02nd June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMA010923232026

Filing Number

WP/68323/2026

Filing Date

16-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/18082/2026

Registration Date

30-Apr-2026

Judge

Honourable Ms. Justice P.T. Asha

Coram

Honourable Ms. Justice P.T. Asha

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Service ( 140 )

Sub-Category

Retirement Benefit cum Pension ( 20 )

Judicial Branch

WRITSECTION

Decision Date

02-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M. Venkatesan,

    Adv. S.Sakthivel, D.Balamurali,P.shanmugam Sudnaram,T.Anbazhagan

  2. 2.R. Annathurai,

  3. 3.L. Mathiyalagan,

  4. 4.K. Ayyanar,

  5. 5.S. Sivakumar,

  6. 6.G. Ragupathy,

  7. 7.N. Vijayakumar,

  8. 8.A. Deiveegan,

  9. 9.J. Rajendran,

  10. 10.G. Balasubramanian,

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Managing Director,

  2. 2.The General Manager,

  3. 3.The Administrator,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Jun-2026

    Honourable Ms. Justice P.T. AshaView PDF

    Summary Ten retired Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation employees sought 12% interest on delayed payment of terminal benefits (gratuity, leave salary, provident fund, and pension commutation). The Madras High Court directed the respondents to pay 6% per annum interest from retirement date to actual disbursement, rejecting the higher rate but accepting the employer's settlement offer, with payment mandated within six weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/18082/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary Ten retired Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation employees sought 12% interest on delayed payment of terminal benefits (gratuity, leave salary, provident fund, and pension commutation). The Madras High Court directed the respondents to pay 6% per annum interest from retirement date to actual disbursement, rejecting the higher rate but accepting the employer's settlement offer, with payment mandated within six weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case