ABISHEK CHORDIA S. RAVICHANDRAN, RAKESH .P ,KALAVATHI ,K. CHANDRASEKARAN vs The STATE TAX OFFICER — WP/17888/2026

Case under Others Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 04th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMA010914462026

e-Filing Number

12-04-2026

Filing Number

WP/67671/2026

Filing Date

15-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/17888/2026

Registration Date

29-Apr-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Coram

Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Tax/Tolls ( 150 )

Judicial Branch

WRITSECTION

Decision Date

04-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ABISHEK CHORDIA S. RAVICHANDRAN, RAKESH .P ,KALAVATHI ,K. CHANDRASEKARAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The STATE TAX OFFICER

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar RamamoorthyView PDF

    Summary of WP No. 17888/2026 The Madras High Court set aside a tax order dated 01.12.2025 issued by the State Tax Officer against Abishek Chordia, finding it violated natural justice principles by denying him a personal hearing. The court remanded the matter for reconsideration on the condition that the petitioner remit 25% of the disputed tax demand within 30 days, after which a fresh order must be issued within three months following reasonable opportunity to be heard. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

  4. 15-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/17888/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of WP No. 17888/2026 The Madras High Court set aside a tax order dated 01.12.2025 issued by the State Tax Officer against Abishek Chordia, finding it violated natural justice principles by denying him a personal hearing. The court remanded the matter for reconsideration on the condition that the petitioner remit 25% of the disputed tax demand within 30 days, after which a fresh order must be issued within three months following reasonable opportunity to be heard. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case