Prisha Metals and Alloys M.HARIHARAN, G.SEETHA,SAMHITA SRINIVAS,RUKMANI VENUGOPALAN,U.C.KIRUTHEKA vs The Assistant Commissioner (CT) — WP/19130/2026

Case under Others Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 08th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMA010914292026

e-Filing Number

11-04-2026

Filing Number

WP/67654/2026

Filing Date

15-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/19130/2026

Registration Date

08-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Coram

Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Tax/Tolls ( 150 )

Judicial Branch

WRITSECTION

Decision Date

08-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Prisha Metals and Alloys M.HARIHARAN, G.SEETHA,SAMHITA SRINIVAS,RUKMANI VENUGOPALAN,U.C.KIRUTHEKA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Assistant Commissioner (CT)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar RamamoorthyView PDF

    Case Summary: WP No. 19130/2026 The Madras High Court set aside a GST tax demand order dated 04.08.2023 against Prisha Metals and Alloys, finding it was issued without granting the petitioner a hearing. Though the petition was filed beyond the limitation period, the court remanded the matter for reconsideration on the condition that the petitioner remit 100% of the disputed tax within 30 days, after which the tax authority must provide a reasonable hearing and issue a fresh order within three months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

  4. 15-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/19130/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP No. 19130/2026 The Madras High Court set aside a GST tax demand order dated 04.08.2023 against Prisha Metals and Alloys, finding it was issued without granting the petitioner a hearing. Though the petition was filed beyond the limitation period, the court remanded the matter for reconsideration on the condition that the petitioner remit 100% of the disputed tax within 30 days, after which the tax authority must provide a reasonable hearing and issue a fresh order within three months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case