Syamala M/s.V.A.Vadivel, R.Parasuraman ,J.Povas ,R.Arulraj,S.Sethuraman ,K.M.Kumar ,For Plaintiff,COURT FEE NOT PAID vs R.Sundaram — TOS/26/2025
Case under Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 232 & 276. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
CNR: HCMA010905682025
Filing Number
TOS/63866/2025
Filing Date
21-Apr-2025
Registration No
TOS/26/2025
Registration Date
21-Apr-2025
Judge
Addl. Master - II
Coram
Addl. Master - II
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
Property Laws ( 126 )
Sub-Category
Letters of Administration ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
ORIGINALSECTION
Last updated 13-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Syamala M/s.V.A.Vadivel, R.Parasuraman ,J.Povas ,R.Arulraj,S.Sethuraman ,K.M.Kumar ,For Plaintiff,COURT FEE NOT PAID
Respondent(s)
-
1.R.Sundaram
Adv. S.Hariharan ,For Defendant ,SOLE DEFENDANT W/S FILED 1123
Case History
-
17-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
17-Jun-2026
For Recording Evidence
Addl. Master - II
-
12-Jun-2026
Addl. Master - IIView PDF
In TOS No.26 of 2025 before the Madras High Court, plaintiff Mrs. Syamala (age 80) was examined in chief on 12.06.2026. The plaintiff's proof affidavit was admitted and treated as evidence in chief examination. The court record documents the witness examination but does not contain a final order on the merits of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Jun-2026
For Recording Evidence
Addl. Master - II
-
05-May-2026
For Recording Evidence
Addl. Master - II
-
20-Apr-2026
For Recording Evidence
Addl. Master - II
-
13-Nov-2025
For Recording Evidence
Addl. Master - II
-
06-Nov-2025
For Recording Evidence
Addl. Master - II
-
31-Oct-2025
For Recording Evidence
Addl. Master - II
-
15-Oct-2025
For Framing Issues
Honourable Dr.Justice R.n.manjula
-
17-Sep-2025
Honourable Dr.Justice R.n.manjulaView PDF
-
05-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Apr-2025
Case filed
Registration No. TOS/26/2025
In TOS No.26 of 2025 before the Madras High Court, plaintiff Mrs. Syamala (age 80) was examined in chief on 12.06.2026. The plaintiff's proof affidavit was admitted and treated as evidence in chief examination. The court record documents the witness examination but does not contain a final order on the merits of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts