JBP Trade Link Pvt Ltd G NATARAJAN, S.SRIDEVI ,K.RAMYA ,N.ASMITHA ,N.SRI PRITHVI REDDY vs The State Tax Officer — WP/17830/2026

Case under Others Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 02nd June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMA010887142026

e-Filing Number

07-04-2026

Filing Number

WP/65636/2026

Filing Date

07-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/17830/2026

Registration Date

29-Apr-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Coram

Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Tax/Tolls ( 150 )

Judicial Branch

WRITSECTION

Decision Date

02-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JBP Trade Link Pvt Ltd G NATARAJAN, S.SRIDEVI ,K.RAMYA ,N.ASMITHA ,N.SRI PRITHVI REDDY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State Tax Officer

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar RamamoorthyView PDF

    The Madras High Court set aside a tax order dated 10.09.2025 against JBP Trade Link Pvt Ltd, finding the petitioner lacked reasonable opportunity to contest the demand as notices were only uploaded on the GST portal without direct communication. The court allowed the petitioner to file a reply to the show cause notice within 15 days and directed the tax officer to grant a fresh personal hearing and issue a new order within three months, noting the petitioner had already paid 100% of the disputed tax demand. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

  4. 07-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/17830/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Madras High Court set aside a tax order dated 10.09.2025 against JBP Trade Link Pvt Ltd, finding the petitioner lacked reasonable opportunity to contest the demand as notices were only uploaded on the GST portal without direct communication. The court allowed the petitioner to file a reply to the show cause notice within 15 days and directed the tax officer to grant a fresh personal hearing and issue a new order within three months, noting the petitioner had already paid 100% of the disputed tax demand. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case