Manikasundaram alias Mani vs Muralidharan — SA/404/2026

Case under U/s 100 of C.p.c Section 1. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCMA010885372026

Filing Number

SA/65484/2026

Filing Date

10-Apr-2026

Registration No

SA/404/2026

Registration Date

03-Jun-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr.Justice S. Sounthar

Coram

Honourable Mr.Justice S. Sounthar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Suits ( 149 )

Sub-Category

Permanent Injunction ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

JUDICIALSECTION

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

U/s 100 of C.p.c Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Manikasundaram alias Mani

    Adv. V.S.Kesavan,B.Singaravelu,B.Singaravelu, ,B.Singaravelu

  2. 2.Ponnusamy

  3. 3.Gopalsamy

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Muralidharan

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr.Justice S. SountharView PDF

    The Second Appeal (SA 404/2026) filed by Manikasundaram alias Mani, Ponnusamy, and Gopalsamy against Muralidharan was admitted on two substantial questions of law: whether classification of a cart track as "Nilaviyal Vandipathai" in revenue records automatically vests the property in Government as public access, and whether lower courts erred in not considering the defendant's title document (Ex.B1 dated 21.08.1964). Notice to respondent is returnable in four weeks, records from lower courts have been called, and the matter is listed for hearing after four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Honourable Mr.Justice S. Sounthar

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. SA/404/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Second Appeal (SA 404/2026) filed by Manikasundaram alias Mani, Ponnusamy, and Gopalsamy against Muralidharan was admitted on two substantial questions of law: whether classification of a cart track as "Nilaviyal Vandipathai" in revenue records automatically vests the property in Government as public access, and whether lower courts erred in not considering the defendant's title document (Ex.B1 dated 21.08.1964). Notice to respondent is returnable in four weeks, records from lower courts have been called, and the matter is listed for hearing after four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case