SHRI OMSHAKTHI INDUSTRIES S.RAMANAN, V.VIJAYALAKSHMI ,P.BHUVANESH vs The Assistant Commissioner(ST) — WP/17385/2026

Case under Others Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 02nd June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMA010881862026

e-Filing Number

09-04-2026

Filing Number

WP/65211/2026

Filing Date

09-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/17385/2026

Registration Date

27-Apr-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Coram

Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Tax/Tolls ( 150 )

Judicial Branch

WRITSECTION

Decision Date

02-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHRI OMSHAKTHI INDUSTRIES S.RAMANAN, V.VIJAYALAKSHMI ,P.BHUVANESH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Assistant Commissioner(ST)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar RamamoorthyView PDF

    Summary of WP 17385/2026 Shri Omshakthi Industries challenged a tax demand order dated 15.09.2025 from the Assistant Commissioner (ST), alleging denial of reasonable opportunity to contest the demand on merits. The Madras High Court set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter for reconsideration, conditioning relief on the petitioner remitting 25% of the disputed tax demand within 30 days, after which the tax authority must issue a fresh order within three months with proper opportunity for the petitioner's representation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

  4. 09-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/17385/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of WP 17385/2026 Shri Omshakthi Industries challenged a tax demand order dated 15.09.2025 from the Assistant Commissioner (ST), alleging denial of reasonable opportunity to contest the demand on merits. The Madras High Court set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter for reconsideration, conditioning relief on the petitioner remitting 25% of the disputed tax demand within 30 days, after which the tax authority must issue a fresh order within three months with proper opportunity for the petitioner's representation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case