M S BLUE STONES Rukmani Venugopalan, K.THARANI,DIVYA.T vs ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER — WP/19790/2026

Case under Others Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 10th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMA010879842026

e-Filing Number

09-04-2026

Filing Number

WP/65046/2026

Filing Date

09-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/19790/2026

Registration Date

14-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Coram

Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Tax/Tolls ( 150 )

Judicial Branch

WRITSECTION

Decision Date

10-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M S BLUE STONES Rukmani Venugopalan, K.THARANI,DIVYA.T

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar RamamoorthyView PDF

    The Madras High Court set aside the Assistant Commissioner's GST tax demand order dated 29.08.2024 against M S Blue Stones, finding it was issued without affording the petitioner a hearing. The court remanded the matter for reconsideration on the condition that the petitioner remit 50% of the disputed tax demand within 30 days, after which the tax authority must issue a fresh order within three months following proper hearing procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

  4. 09-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/19790/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Madras High Court set aside the Assistant Commissioner's GST tax demand order dated 29.08.2024 against M S Blue Stones, finding it was issued without affording the petitioner a hearing. The court remanded the matter for reconsideration on the condition that the petitioner remit 50% of the disputed tax demand within 30 days, after which the tax authority must issue a fresh order within three months following proper hearing procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case