GR CONSTRUCTION PRIVATE LIMITED CHINNASAMY V, M.RAMIAH ,R.SITHARTHAN ,R.JAYA ,D.BHOOPALAN ,K.PALANIAMMAL vs The Assistant Commissioner — WP/17866/2026

Case under Others Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 02nd June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMA010876092026

e-Filing Number

09-04-2026

Filing Number

WP/64840/2026

Filing Date

09-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/17866/2026

Registration Date

29-Apr-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Coram

Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Tax/Tolls ( 150 )

Judicial Branch

WRITSECTION

Decision Date

02-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GR CONSTRUCTION PRIVATE LIMITED CHINNASAMY V, M.RAMIAH ,R.SITHARTHAN ,R.JAYA ,D.BHOOPALAN ,K.PALANIAMMAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Assistant Commissioner

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar RamamoorthyView PDF

    Case Summary: WP 17866/2026 GR Construction Private Limited challenged the cancellation of its GST registration (GSTIN 33AAHCG3248E1ZW) via order dated 06.03.2023. The High Court of Madras disposed of the petition after the Government Counsel disclosed that the original cancellation order had been revoked and a subsequent cancellation was issued on 17.07.2024. The court granted the petitioner leave to challenge the new cancellation order dated 17.07.2024 or seek its revocation in accordance with law, and disposed the petition without costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

  4. 09-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/17866/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP 17866/2026 GR Construction Private Limited challenged the cancellation of its GST registration (GSTIN 33AAHCG3248E1ZW) via order dated 06.03.2023. The High Court of Madras disposed of the petition after the Government Counsel disclosed that the original cancellation order had been revoked and a subsequent cancellation was issued on 17.07.2024. The court granted the petitioner leave to challenge the new cancellation order dated 17.07.2024 or seek its revocation in accordance with law, and disposed the petition without costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case