Sri Murugan Constructions Adithya Reddy, VAANI SREEKANT IYER,RAGHUNANDAN SRIRAM,PRANAV DEVARAJ,DHANESH vs The Deputy State Tax Officer 2 — WP/19603/2026

Case under Others Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 10th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMA010874842026

e-Filing Number

08-04-2026

Filing Number

WP/64743/2026

Filing Date

08-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/19603/2026

Registration Date

13-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Coram

Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Tax/Tolls ( 150 )

Judicial Branch

WRITSECTION

Decision Date

10-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sri Murugan Constructions Adithya Reddy, VAANI SREEKANT IYER,RAGHUNANDAN SRIRAM,PRANAV DEVARAJ,DHANESH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Deputy State Tax Officer 2

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar RamamoorthyView PDF

    Case Summary: WP 19603/2026 The Madras High Court set aside the Deputy State Tax Officer's order dated 13.02.2025 (FY 2023-24) for being issued without hearing the petitioner, violating natural justice principles. The court remanded the matter for reconsideration with a fresh opportunity for the petitioner to contest the tax demand on merits, conditioned on the petitioner remitting 25% of the disputed tax demand within thirty days, with a fresh order to be issued within three months thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

  4. 08-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/19603/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP 19603/2026 The Madras High Court set aside the Deputy State Tax Officer's order dated 13.02.2025 (FY 2023-24) for being issued without hearing the petitioner, violating natural justice principles. The court remanded the matter for reconsideration with a fresh opportunity for the petitioner to contest the tax demand on merits, conditioned on the petitioner remitting 25% of the disputed tax demand within thirty days, with a fresh order to be issued within three months thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case