H R D CONSTRUCTIONS Adithya Reddy, DHANESH ,PRANAV DEVARAJ ,RAGHUNANDAN SRIRAM ,VAANI SREEKANT IYER vs The Assistant commissioner(ST) — WP/19639/2026

Case under Others Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 10th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMA010857652026

e-Filing Number

04-04-2026

Filing Number

WP/63448/2026

Filing Date

06-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/19639/2026

Registration Date

13-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Coram

Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Tax/Tolls ( 150 )

Judicial Branch

WRITSECTION

Decision Date

10-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.H R D CONSTRUCTIONS Adithya Reddy, DHANESH ,PRANAV DEVARAJ ,RAGHUNANDAN SRIRAM ,VAANI SREEKANT IYER

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Assistant commissioner(ST)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar RamamoorthyView PDF

    Case Summary: WP 19639/2026 The Madras High Court set aside a tax order dated 26.12.2025 issued by the Assistant Commissioner (ST) against HRD Constructions, finding it violated natural justice principles as the petitioner was not afforded proper opportunity to respond to the show cause notice or participate in hearings. The court remanded the matter for reconsideration on the condition that the petitioner remit 10% of the disputed tax demand within thirty days, after which the tax authority must issue a fresh order within three months following a reasonable hearing opportunity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/19639/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP 19639/2026 The Madras High Court set aside a tax order dated 26.12.2025 issued by the Assistant Commissioner (ST) against HRD Constructions, finding it violated natural justice principles as the petitioner was not afforded proper opportunity to respond to the show cause notice or participate in hearings. The court remanded the matter for reconsideration on the condition that the petitioner remit 10% of the disputed tax demand within thirty days, after which the tax authority must issue a fresh order within three months following a reasonable hearing opportunity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case