Tvl AVD Traders, Adithya Reddy, Dhanesh,Pranav Devaraj,Raghunandan Sriram,Vanni Sreekant Iyer vs Deputy Commissioner (CT) — WP/17481/2026

Case under Others Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 02nd June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMA010857302026

e-Filing Number

03-04-2026

Filing Number

WP/63424/2026

Filing Date

06-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/17481/2026

Registration Date

28-Apr-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Coram

Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Tax/Tolls ( 150 )

Judicial Branch

WRITSECTION

Decision Date

02-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Tvl AVD Traders, Adithya Reddy, Dhanesh,Pranav Devaraj,Raghunandan Sriram,Vanni Sreekant Iyer

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Deputy Commissioner (CT)

  2. 2.Depurty State Tax Officer - 2,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar RamamoorthyView PDF

    Case Summary: WP 17481/2026 Tvl. AVD Traders challenged a GST appellate order dated 23.04.2025 that rejected their appeal as time-barred under Section 107 of GST enactments. The Madras High Court dismissed the writ petition, holding that since GST enactments are self-contained codes, the rejection based on condonable period non-compliance contains no infirmity warranting interference. The petitioner was left open to file a writ petition challenging the original order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/17481/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP 17481/2026 Tvl. AVD Traders challenged a GST appellate order dated 23.04.2025 that rejected their appeal as time-barred under Section 107 of GST enactments. The Madras High Court dismissed the writ petition, holding that since GST enactments are self-contained codes, the rejection based on condonable period non-compliance contains no infirmity warranting interference. The petitioner was left open to file a writ petition challenging the original order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case