D.RAKESH, M/S.R.REVANTH KUMAR, R.RAJAKUMARAN,V.GOPINATH vs THE CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER, — WP/14335/2026
Case under Others Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 10th April 2026.
CNR: HCMA010855192026
Filing Number
WP/63259/2026
Filing Date
08-Apr-2026
Registration No
WP/14335/2026
Registration Date
08-Apr-2026
Judge
Honourable The Chief Justice , Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul Murugan
Coram
Honourable The Chief Justice , Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul Murugan
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
Public Interest Litigation ( 128 )
Sub-Category
Other PIL Matters ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
WRITSECTION
Decision Date
10-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 14-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.D.RAKESH, M/S.R.REVANTH KUMAR, R.RAJAKUMARAN,V.GOPINATH
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER,
-
2.The Chief Electoral Officer,Tamil Nadu,
-
3.The Secretary ( I and B),Government of India,
-
4.The Chief Executive Officer,
-
5.Aditya Dhar and Lokesh Dhar,
-
6.Jyoti Deshpande,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Apr-2026
Court Summary The Madras High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking to ban the film "Durandhar: The Revenge" from exhibition in Tamil Nadu during the 2026 election model code of conduct period. The court held that once the Central Board of Film Certification grants certification, there is a presumption the authority considered all guidelines including public order, and the film cannot be stalled merely because a section of society objects to it. The court relied on Supreme Court precedents establishing that States must maintain law and order rather than suppress certified films based on apprehended public reaction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Apr-2026
For Admission
Honourable The Chief Justice , Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul Murugan
-
08-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/14335/2026
Court Summary The Madras High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking to ban the film "Durandhar: The Revenge" from exhibition in Tamil Nadu during the 2026 election model code of conduct period. The court held that once the Central Board of Film Certification grants certification, there is a presumption the authority considered all guidelines including public order, and the film cannot be stalled merely because a section of society objects to it. The court relied on Supreme Court precedents establishing that States must maintain law and order rather than suppress certified films based on apprehended public reaction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts