KUMARESAN LOGESH P.JAMES VICTOR RAJKUMAR, K.S.PANDIYAN,N.RAJASEKAR vs The State Tax Officer, — WP/19729/2026

Case under Others Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 10th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMA010853922026

e-Filing Number

07-04-2026

Filing Number

WP/63153/2026

Filing Date

07-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/19729/2026

Registration Date

14-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Coram

Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Tax/Tolls ( 150 )

Judicial Branch

WRITSECTION

Decision Date

10-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KUMARESAN LOGESH P.JAMES VICTOR RAJKUMAR, K.S.PANDIYAN,N.RAJASEKAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State Tax Officer,

  2. 2.The State Tax Officer,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar RamamoorthyView PDF

    Case Summary: WP 19729/2026 Court Decision: The Madras High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a Form ASMT 10 notice dated 17.03.2026 as infructuous, since an assessment order was subsequently issued on 08.06.2026 following a show cause notice dated 11.05.2026. The court left it open to the petitioner to challenge the assessment order through appropriate legal remedies, with no order on costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

  4. 07-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/19729/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP 19729/2026 Court Decision: The Madras High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a Form ASMT 10 notice dated 17.03.2026 as infructuous, since an assessment order was subsequently issued on 08.06.2026 following a show cause notice dated 11.05.2026. The court left it open to the petitioner to challenge the assessment order through appropriate legal remedies, with no order on costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case