R.PALANI S.Natarajan, S.ARUNKUMAR,G.VIGNEHWAR vs VENKATA NARAYANAN — CMP/11577/2026

Case under U/o Xiv Rule Viii of O.s.rules Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DELAY CONDONED on 02nd June 2026.

CNR: HCMA010849262026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

CMP/62752/2026

Filing Date

07-04-2026

Registration No

CMP/11577/2026

Registration Date

29-04-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr Justice P. VELMURUGAN , Honourable Mrs.Justice K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI

Coram

Honourable Mr Justice P. VELMURUGAN , Honourable Mrs.Justice K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI

Bench Type

Division Bench

Judicial Branch

JUDICIALSECTION

Decision Date

02nd June 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DELAY CONDONED

Acts & Sections

U/o Xiv Rule Viii of O.s.rules Section 1

Petitioner(s)

R.PALANI S.Natarajan, S.ARUNKUMAR,G.VIGNEHWAR

Respondent(s)

VENKATA NARAYANAN

A.Sankara Subramanian

A.Shanmuga Sundaram Alias D.A.Shanmugam,

B.Umadevi

A.Padmini

R.Thiruvengadam

R.Raghavan

R.Revathy

Hearing History

Judge: Honourable Mr Justice P. VELMURUGAN , Honourable Mrs.Justice K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI

02-06-2026

TO CONDONE DELAY IN DEFICIT COURT FEE

Orders

02-06-2026
Honourable Mr Justice P. VELMURUGAN,Honourable Mrs.Justice K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI

The Madras High Court granted petitioner R. Palani's petition to condone a 116-day delay in paying Rs. 5,000 deficit court fees for an appeal (O.S.A.SR.No.206321 of 2025) against original suit C.S.No.872 of 2015. The court was satisfied with the affidavit's averments and approved the delay condoning request conditionally, requiring the petitioner to deposit the deficit court fee within one week, failing which the petition would stand automatically dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Madras High Court granted petitioner R. Palani's petition to condone a 116-day delay in paying Rs. 5,000 deficit court fees for an appeal (O.S.A.SR.No.206321 of 2025) against original suit C.S.No.872 of 2015. The court was satisfied with the affidavit's averments and approved the delay condoning request conditionally, requiring the petitioner to deposit the deficit court fee within one week, failing which the petition would stand automatically dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

U/o Xiv Rule Viii of O.s.rules All acts →

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case