Tenure Holidays M/S. A. DHAMODARAN, N. GUHAN ,V IGNESH KANNAN vs The State Tax Officer, — WP/19077/2026

Case under Others Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 10th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMA010840472026

e-Filing Number

06-04-2026

Filing Number

WP/62172/2026

Filing Date

06-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/19077/2026

Registration Date

08-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Coram

Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Tax/Tolls ( 150 )

Judicial Branch

WRITSECTION

Decision Date

10-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Tenure Holidays M/S. A. DHAMODARAN, N. GUHAN ,V IGNESH KANNAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State Tax Officer,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar RamamoorthyView PDF

    CASE SUMMARY: WP 19077/2026 The Madras High Court set aside a GST assessment order against Tenure Holidays, finding it unreasonable to expect the petitioner to monitor the tax portal 4-5 years after GST registration cancellation in 2019. The court remanded the matter for reconsideration on the condition that the petitioner remits 25% of the disputed tax demand within 30 days, with a fresh order to be issued within three months, and the bank attachment to be raised upon payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/19077/2026

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY: WP 19077/2026 The Madras High Court set aside a GST assessment order against Tenure Holidays, finding it unreasonable to expect the petitioner to monitor the tax portal 4-5 years after GST registration cancellation in 2019. The court remanded the matter for reconsideration on the condition that the petitioner remits 25% of the disputed tax demand within 30 days, with a fresh order to be issued within three months, and the bank attachment to be raised upon payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case