M/s. SHIVA GURU GLASS AND PLYWOODS S.MUTHU KUMAR, V.S.ARIHARA SUDHAN,T.KALAIYARASI,A.MAHAMED NIHAT vs The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (ST)(GST) — WP/18608/2026

Case under Others Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 05th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMA010840372026

e-Filing Number

04-04-2026

Filing Number

WP/62165/2026

Filing Date

06-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/18608/2026

Registration Date

06-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Coram

Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Tax/Tolls ( 150 )

Judicial Branch

WRITSECTION

Decision Date

05-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/s. SHIVA GURU GLASS AND PLYWOODS S.MUTHU KUMAR, V.S.ARIHARA SUDHAN,T.KALAIYARASI,A.MAHAMED NIHAT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (ST)(GST)

  2. 2.The Commercial Tax Officer/The State Tax Officer (ST)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar RamamoorthyView PDF

    Case Summary: WP 18608/2026 M/s. Shiva Guru Glass and Plywoods challenged a GST tax order dated 10.12.2025 for the period April 2021-March 2022, primarily on grounds of breach of natural justice. The Madras High Court set aside the impugned order and remanded it for reconsideration, subject to the petitioner paying 25% of the disputed tax demand within 30 days. The tax authority must then provide reasonable opportunity to the petitioner and issue a fresh order within three months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/18608/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP 18608/2026 M/s. Shiva Guru Glass and Plywoods challenged a GST tax order dated 10.12.2025 for the period April 2021-March 2022, primarily on grounds of breach of natural justice. The Madras High Court set aside the impugned order and remanded it for reconsideration, subject to the petitioner paying 25% of the disputed tax demand within 30 days. The tax authority must then provide reasonable opportunity to the petitioner and issue a fresh order within three months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case