G.Murali Balaji Industires Adithya Reddy, Dhanesh,Raghunnandhan Sriram,Vaani Sreekanth iyer vs State of Tamil Nadu — TC/15/2026
Case under U/s 60 of Tnvat Act, 2006 Section 1. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HCMA010836652026
Next Hearing
: -
e-Filing Number
04-04-2026
Filing Number
TC/61841/2026
Filing Date
06-04-2026
Registration No
TC/15/2026
Registration Date
14-05-2026
Judge
Honourable Dr Justice G. JAYACHANDRAN , Honourable Mrs.Justice N. MALA
Coram
Honourable Dr Justice G. JAYACHANDRAN , Honourable Mrs.Justice N. MALA
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
T.C. APPEAL/REVISION ( 170 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIALSECTION
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
G.Murali Balaji Industires Adithya Reddy, Dhanesh,Raghunnandhan Sriram,Vaani Sreekanth iyer
Respondent(s)
State of Tamil Nadu
Hearing History
Judge: Honourable Dr Justice G. JAYACHANDRAN , Honourable Mrs.Justice N. MALA
FOR ADMISSION - TAX CASES
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-06-2026 | FOR ADMISSION - TAX CASES |
Orders
Case Summary: TC 15/2026 The High Court of Madras admitted G. Murali Balaji Industries' tax case under Section 60(1) of the TNVAT Act, 2006, challenging the Tamil Nadu Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal's order dated 08/01/2026. The court admitted three substantial questions of law: whether the Tribunal erred in allowing the State's appeal regarding Rs. 12,69,663 in sales suppression calculated via formula method; whether the Tribunal disregarded the petitioner's submitted explanations and documents; and whether the Tribunal wrongly confirmed 14.5% tax levy instead of 5% applicable for industrial inputs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: TC 15/2026 The High Court of Madras admitted G. Murali Balaji Industries' tax case under Section 60(1) of the TNVAT Act, 2006, challenging the Tamil Nadu Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal's order dated 08/01/2026. The court admitted three substantial questions of law: whether the Tribunal erred in allowing the State's appeal regarding Rs. 12,69,663 in sales suppression calculated via formula method; whether the Tribunal disregarded the petitioner's submitted explanations and documents; and whether the Tribunal wrongly confirmed 14.5% tax levy instead of 5% applicable for industrial inputs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts