G.Murali Balaji Industires Adithya Reddy, Dhanesh,Raghunnandhan Sriram,Vaani Sreekanth iyer vs State of Tamil Nadu — TC/15/2026

Case under U/s 60 of Tnvat Act, 2006 Section 1. Next hearing: : -.

CNR: HCMA010836652026

Next Hearing

: -

e-Filing Number

04-04-2026

Filing Number

TC/61841/2026

Filing Date

06-04-2026

Registration No

TC/15/2026

Registration Date

14-05-2026

Judge

Honourable Dr Justice G. JAYACHANDRAN , Honourable Mrs.Justice N. MALA

Coram

Honourable Dr Justice G. JAYACHANDRAN , Honourable Mrs.Justice N. MALA

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

T.C. APPEAL/REVISION ( 170 )

Judicial Branch

JUDICIALSECTION

Acts & Sections

U/s 60 of Tnvat Act, 2006 Section 1

Petitioner(s)

G.Murali Balaji Industires Adithya Reddy, Dhanesh,Raghunnandhan Sriram,Vaani Sreekanth iyer

Respondent(s)

State of Tamil Nadu

Hearing History

Judge: Honourable Dr Justice G. JAYACHANDRAN , Honourable Mrs.Justice N. MALA

02-06-2026

FOR ADMISSION - TAX CASES

Orders

02-06-2026
Honourable Dr Justice G. JAYACHANDRAN,Honourable Mrs.Justice N. MALA

Case Summary: TC 15/2026 The High Court of Madras admitted G. Murali Balaji Industries' tax case under Section 60(1) of the TNVAT Act, 2006, challenging the Tamil Nadu Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal's order dated 08/01/2026. The court admitted three substantial questions of law: whether the Tribunal erred in allowing the State's appeal regarding Rs. 12,69,663 in sales suppression calculated via formula method; whether the Tribunal disregarded the petitioner's submitted explanations and documents; and whether the Tribunal wrongly confirmed 14.5% tax levy instead of 5% applicable for industrial inputs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: TC 15/2026 The High Court of Madras admitted G. Murali Balaji Industries' tax case under Section 60(1) of the TNVAT Act, 2006, challenging the Tamil Nadu Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal's order dated 08/01/2026. The court admitted three substantial questions of law: whether the Tribunal erred in allowing the State's appeal regarding Rs. 12,69,663 in sales suppression calculated via formula method; whether the Tribunal disregarded the petitioner's submitted explanations and documents; and whether the Tribunal wrongly confirmed 14.5% tax levy instead of 5% applicable for industrial inputs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case