G.Murali Balaji Industires Adithya Reddy, Dhanesh,Raghunnandhan Sriram,Vaani Sreekanth iyer vs State of Tamil Nadu — TC/15/2026
Case under U/s 60 of Tnvat Act, 2006 Section 1. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HCMA010836652026
e-Filing Number
04-04-2026
Filing Number
TC/61841/2026
Filing Date
06-Apr-2026
Registration No
TC/15/2026
Registration Date
14-May-2026
Judge
Honourable Dr Justice G. Jayachandran , Honourable Mrs.Justice N. Mala
Coram
Honourable Dr Justice G. Jayachandran , Honourable Mrs.Justice N. Mala
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
T.C. APPEAL/REVISION ( 170 )
Judicial Branch
JUDICIALSECTION
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.G.Murali Balaji Industires Adithya Reddy, Dhanesh,Raghunnandhan Sriram,Vaani Sreekanth iyer
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Tamil Nadu
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
02-Jun-2026
Honourable Dr Justice G. JAYACHANDRAN,Honourable Mrs.Justice N. MalaView PDF
Case Summary: TC 15/2026 The High Court of Madras admitted G. Murali Balaji Industries' tax case under Section 60(1) of the TNVAT Act, 2006, challenging the Tamil Nadu Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal's order dated 08/01/2026. The court admitted three substantial questions of law: whether the Tribunal erred in allowing the State's appeal regarding Rs. 12,69,663 in sales suppression calculated via formula method; whether the Tribunal disregarded the petitioner's submitted explanations and documents; and whether the Tribunal wrongly confirmed 14.5% tax levy instead of 5% applicable for industrial inputs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Jun-2026
For Admission - Tax Cases
Honourable Dr Justice G. Jayachandran , Honourable Mrs.Justice N. Mala
-
06-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. TC/15/2026
Case Summary: TC 15/2026 The High Court of Madras admitted G. Murali Balaji Industries' tax case under Section 60(1) of the TNVAT Act, 2006, challenging the Tamil Nadu Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal's order dated 08/01/2026. The court admitted three substantial questions of law: whether the Tribunal erred in allowing the State's appeal regarding Rs. 12,69,663 in sales suppression calculated via formula method; whether the Tribunal disregarded the petitioner's submitted explanations and documents; and whether the Tribunal wrongly confirmed 14.5% tax levy instead of 5% applicable for industrial inputs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts