C. Selvakumar, vs The Chief Election Commissioner — WP/14060/2026

Case under Others Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWAL on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMA010821072026

Filing Number

WP/60636/2026

Filing Date

06-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/14060/2026

Registration Date

07-Apr-2026

Judge

Honourable The Chief Justice , Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul Murugan

Coram

Honourable The Chief Justice , Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul Murugan

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

Public Interest Litigation ( 128 )

Sub-Category

Other PIL Matters ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

WRITSECTION

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWAL

Last updated 14-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.C. Selvakumar,

    Adv. K.Kannan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Chief Election Commissioner

  2. 2.The Chief Electoral Officer,

  3. 3.The Principal Secretary to Government

  4. 4.The Director

  5. 5.The Director

  6. 6.The Managing Director

  7. 7.The Director

  8. 8.The Director

  9. 9.The Director General

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Honourable The Chief JUSTICE,Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul MuruganView PDF

    Summary The Madras High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by C. Selvakumar as withdrawn, permitting him to approach the competent authority for redressal of his grievances concerning alleged misuse of welfare schemes and election machinery, and alleged corruption in works by TAHDCO. No costs were imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    For Admission

    Honourable The Chief Justice , Honourable Mr.Justice G.arul Murugan

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/14060/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Madras High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by C. Selvakumar as withdrawn, permitting him to approach the competent authority for redressal of his grievances concerning alleged misuse of welfare schemes and election machinery, and alleged corruption in works by TAHDCO. No costs were imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case