Subbramanian vs The Superintendent of Police (Crime) — HCP/681/2026

Case under Non-statutory (General) Section 1. Disposed: Contested--CLOSED on 16th April 2026.

CNR: HCMA010819642026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

HCP/21425/2026

Filing Date

06-04-2026

Registration No

HCP/681/2026

Registration Date

09-04-2026

Judge

Honourable Dr.Justice ANITA SUMANTH , Honourable Mr.Justice SUNDER MOHAN

Coram

Honourable Dr.Justice ANITA SUMANTH , Honourable Mr.Justice SUNDER MOHAN

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

Constitution ( 34 )

Sub-Category

Non-Statutory (General) ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINALSECTION

Decision Date

16th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--CLOSED

Acts & Sections

Non-statutory (General) Section 1

Petitioner(s)

Subbramanian

Adv. Kanimozhi Mathi,S.Vasuki,S.Vasuki, A.S.K.Vasanthkumar,E.Rufina,S.Vasuki

Respondent(s)

The Superintendent of Police (Crime)

The Inspector of Police,

Hearing History

Judge: Honourable Dr.Justice ANITA SUMANTH , Honourable Mr.Justice SUNDER MOHAN

15-04-2026

FOR ADMISSION-HCP(GEN)

16-04-2026

FOR ADMISSION-HCP(GEN)

Orders

16-04-2026
Honourable Dr.Justice ANITA SUMANTH,Honourable Mr.Justice SUNDER MOHAN

The Madras High Court dismissed the habeas corpus petition filed by Subbramanian seeking the release of his daughter Yuvasri, aged 23. The court found no illegal detention after the detenue confirmed in court that she had voluntarily married Sanyasi Mohaptra on 11.12.2025 and wished to reside with him, with the petitioner present and witnessing the exchange. The court closed the petition, provided contact details to the petitioner, and awarded no costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Madras High Court dismissed the habeas corpus petition filed by Subbramanian seeking the release of his daughter Yuvasri, aged 23. The court found no illegal detention after the detenue confirmed in court that she had voluntarily married Sanyasi Mohaptra on 11.12.2025 and wished to reside with him, with the petitioner present and witnessing the exchange. The court closed the petition, provided contact details to the petitioner, and awarded no costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case