S.BHUVANESHWARI vs THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE — CMP/10571/2026

Case under U/o Iv Rule 9(4) of as Rules Section 1. Disposed: Contested--ORDERED on 02nd June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMA010804582026

Filing Number

CMP/59374/2026

Filing Date

02-Apr-2026

Registration No

CMP/10571/2026

Registration Date

21-Apr-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr Justice S. M. Subramaniam , Honourable Mr.Justice N.senthilkumar

Coram

Honourable Mr Justice S. M. Subramaniam , Honourable Mr.Justice N.senthilkumar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Service ( 140 )

Sub-Category

State and Other Authorities under article 12 ( 18 )

Judicial Branch

JUDICIALSECTION

Decision Date

02-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ORDERED

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

U/o Iv Rule 9(4) of as Rules Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.S.BHUVANESHWARI

    Adv. J.Ashok,KARTHIKAA ASHOK,KARTHIKAA ASHOK, KARTHIKAA ASHOK

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE

  2. 2.The Commissioner of Police

  3. 3.The Tamil Nadu Uniformed Services

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr Justice S. M. SUBRAMANIAM,Honourable Mr.Justice N.senthilkumarView PDF

    The court allowed the petition filed by S. Bhuvaneshwari seeking condonation of a 140-day delay in re-presenting papers in an appeal (W.A (SR) No.164463 of 2025). The court accepted the reasons provided in the supporting affidavit and granted condonation of delay, directing the Registry to number the appeal if otherwise in order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Jun-2026

    Miscellaneous Petitions

    Honourable Mr Justice S. M. Subramaniam , Honourable Mr.Justice N.senthilkumar

  4. 02-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CMP/10571/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the petition filed by S. Bhuvaneshwari seeking condonation of a 140-day delay in re-presenting papers in an appeal (W.A (SR) No.164463 of 2025). The court accepted the reasons provided in the supporting affidavit and granted condonation of delay, directing the Registry to number the appeal if otherwise in order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case