Astromar Logistics Private Limited M.HARIHARAN, U.C.KIRUTHEKA,RUKMANI VENUGOPALAN,SAMHITA SRINIVAS vs State Tax Officer — WP/18117/2026

Case under Others Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 04th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMA010798082026

e-Filing Number

30-03-2026

Filing Number

WP/58941/2026

Filing Date

30-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP/18117/2026

Registration Date

30-Apr-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Coram

Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Tax/Tolls ( 150 )

Judicial Branch

WRITSECTION

Decision Date

04-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Astromar Logistics Private Limited M.HARIHARAN, U.C.KIRUTHEKA,RUKMANI VENUGOPALAN,SAMHITA SRINIVAS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Tax Officer

  2. 2.The Bank Manager,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar RamamoorthyView PDF

    Case Summary: WP 18117/2026 - Astromar Logistics Private Limited v. State Tax Officer The Madras High Court set aside a GST tax demand order dated 04.12.2025 issued by the State Tax Officer without affording the petitioner a hearing. The court found the order violated natural justice principles by not providing reasonable opportunity to contest the demand on merits. The matter was remanded for reconsideration with a condition that the petitioner remit 10% of the disputed tax demand within 30 days, following which a fresh order must be issued within three months with proper hearing. Bank account attachment was ordered to be raised. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

  4. 30-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/18117/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP 18117/2026 - Astromar Logistics Private Limited v. State Tax Officer The Madras High Court set aside a GST tax demand order dated 04.12.2025 issued by the State Tax Officer without affording the petitioner a hearing. The court found the order violated natural justice principles by not providing reasonable opportunity to contest the demand on merits. The matter was remanded for reconsideration with a condition that the petitioner remit 10% of the disputed tax demand within 30 days, following which a fresh order must be issued within three months with proper hearing. Bank account attachment was ordered to be raised. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case