UBER9 BUSINESS PROCESS SERVICES Pvt Ltd DHANARAM RAMACHANDRAN, R.DEVI,VINOD CHOUDARY,R.REKA,ELAKIYA.S,A.SAMYUKTHA vs The Principal Commissioner of Income tax — WP/17678/2026

Case under Others Section 1. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.

Next hearing 17-Jun-2026

CNR: HCMA010794782026

e-Filing Number

31-03-2026

Filing Number

WP/58693/2026

Filing Date

01-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/17678/2026

Registration Date

28-Apr-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Coram

Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Income Tax ( 87 )

Judicial Branch

WRITSECTION

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.UBER9 BUSINESS PROCESS SERVICES Pvt Ltd DHANARAM RAMACHANDRAN, R.DEVI,VINOD CHOUDARY,R.REKA,ELAKIYA.S,A.SAMYUKTHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Principal Commissioner of Income tax

  2. 2.The Assessing officer

Case History

  1. 17-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 17-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

  3. 02-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar RamamoorthyView PDF

    Case Summary: WP 17678/2026 In this writ petition before the Madras High Court, UBER9 Business Process Services Pvt Ltd challenged Income Tax Department actions regarding a refund. The court noted that Rs. 30,82,961 was recently refunded to the petitioner and adjourned the matter to 17.06.2026. The court directed the Income Tax Department to file a report regarding the petitioner's request for an additional refund of approximately Rs. 58 lakhs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 02-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 01-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/17678/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP 17678/2026 In this writ petition before the Madras High Court, UBER9 Business Process Services Pvt Ltd challenged Income Tax Department actions regarding a refund. The court noted that Rs. 30,82,961 was recently refunded to the petitioner and adjourned the matter to 17.06.2026. The court directed the Income Tax Department to file a report regarding the petitioner's request for an additional refund of approximately Rs. 58 lakhs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case