Padmavathy, vs Thamaravardhini(Deceased) — CMP/12760/2026

Case under U/o 22 R 9 Cpc Section 1. Disposed: --ALLOWED on 19th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMA010794342026

Filing Number

CMP/58656/2026

Filing Date

01-Apr-2026

Registration No

CMP/12760/2026

Registration Date

13-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr.Justice R.sakthivel

Coram

Honourable Mr.Justice R.sakthivel

Bench Type

Single Bench

Judicial Branch

JUDICIALSECTION

Decision Date

19-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

U/o 22 R 9 Cpc Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Padmavathy,

    Adv. Anish Gopi,L.SARATH PANDIAN,L.SARATH PANDIAN, L.SARATH PANDIAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Thamaravardhini(Deceased)

    Adv. R19 - R.BANU PRIYA,R18 - R.SHARMILA,R17 - R.VINODHINI,R16 - R.SANGEETHA,(TRACKING SHEET FILED),R16 TO R19 - ITEM DELIVERED ON 11/06/2026,------------------,PVT NOTICE,===============,NOTICE SENT TO R16 TO R19 - SERVICE AWAITED,--------------------------,THROUGH C.M.M. COURT ,EGMORE, CHENNAI,==============,R18 - REFUSED,R17 & R19 - PRESENTLY NOT AVAILABLE,R16 - PRESENTLY NOT AVAILABLE,----------------------------,notice to proposed respondents R16 TO R19 ORDERED THROUGH COURT & POST DT. 08/06/2026 (THROUGH NAZIR HCT,MADRAS) 1123

  2. 2.Indirani,

  3. 3.Harikumar,

  4. 4.M.Kothandapani,

  5. 5.M.Rajeswari(Deceased)

  6. 6.M.Hemavathi,

  7. 7.Krishnakumar,

  8. 8.Jakkubai,

  9. 9.Subamaniyan,

  10. 10.Bawerlal,

  11. 11.K.Rajamanickam,

  12. 12.R.Immanuel Jacob Josephraj,

  13. 13.R.Moris Johnson Amalraj,

  14. 14.C.Arul Mary,

  15. 15.Minor Reselin Amala Mary,

  16. 16.R.Sangeetha,

  17. 17.R.Vinodhini,

  18. 18.R.Sharmila,

  19. 19.R.Banu Priya,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr.Justice R.sakthivelView PDF

    Summary: The Madras High Court allowed Padmavathy's Civil Miscellaneous Petition to implead four proposed respondents (R. Sangeetha, R. Vinodhini, R. Sharmila, and R. Banu Priya) as parties in the pending Second Appeal. The court found that service was sufficient and the reasons stated in the affidavit justified their impleadment under CPC Order XXII Rule 9. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Jun-2026

    Supreme Court Remanded Cases

    Honourable Mr.Justice R.sakthivel

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CMP/12760/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Madras High Court allowed Padmavathy's Civil Miscellaneous Petition to implead four proposed respondents (R. Sangeetha, R. Vinodhini, R. Sharmila, and R. Banu Priya) as parties in the pending Second Appeal. The court found that service was sufficient and the reasons stated in the affidavit justified their impleadment under CPC Order XXII Rule 9. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case