Smt Lalitha Kishore RAVI KANNAN, ANAND RAM R,VARUN RANGANATHAN TN,N.SENTHIL KUMAR vs The Superintendent of Goods and Service Tax and Central Excise, Coonoor Range — WP/18458/2026
Case under Others Section 1. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.
CNR: HCMA010791632026
e-Filing Number
27-03-2026
Filing Number
WP/58431/2026
Filing Date
27-Mar-2026
Registration No
WP/18458/2026
Registration Date
06-May-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
Coram
Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
Tax/Tolls ( 150 )
Judicial Branch
WRITSECTION
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Smt Lalitha Kishore RAVI KANNAN, ANAND RAM R,VARUN RANGANATHAN TN,N.SENTHIL KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Superintendent of Goods and Service Tax and Central Excise, Coonoor Range
-
2.The Principal Commissioner of GST and Central Excise,
-
3.Manoj Kumar Jain
Case History
-
25-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
25-Jun-2026
For Admission
Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
-
04-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar RamamoorthyView PDF
Case Summary: WP/18458/2026 On 04-06-2026, the Madras High Court (Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy) adjourned three consolidated writ petitions filed by Lalitha Kishore, Asha Rajesh Surana, and Pushpa D. Jain against GST authorities and Manoj Kumar Jain. Notice was issued to the third respondent returnable on 25.06.2026, with private notice also permitted, and the matter was listed for hearing on that date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/18458/2026
Case Summary: WP/18458/2026 On 04-06-2026, the Madras High Court (Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy) adjourned three consolidated writ petitions filed by Lalitha Kishore, Asha Rajesh Surana, and Pushpa D. Jain against GST authorities and Manoj Kumar Jain. Notice was issued to the third respondent returnable on 25.06.2026, with private notice also permitted, and the matter was listed for hearing on that date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts